There's gotta be a WICKED Animated Miniseries (or a Full-length Movie-Musical)!

'Who couldn't be happier' than to find something WICKED showing up one day in your curious hours of boredom? Yes, I was surprised when the official facebook page of WICKED THE MUSICAL posted a link to an article about a possible Wicked Animated Film with the cartoon sketches by Disney animator and visual development artist Minkyu Lee (The Princess and the Frog, Adam and Dog, Frozen).

Lee revealed on his Tumblr blog sketches of the characters from Broadway's Hit Musical 'Wicked':

“The Woman Who Had Two Navels” (Nick Joaquin) Summary

                The story begins with Connie Escobar, daughter of a politician and a famous beauty, visiting Pepe Monson, a horse doctor, in Hong Kong for a consultation because she has TWO NAVELS. She wanted him to remove her other navel through a surgical operation because if she will be going to give birth, where would the other umbilical cord be connected? In addition, she does not want to become a freak when she has to undress for her husband.  She said she is 30 years old and has just been married hours ago. Then, she told Pepe about a story from her childhood. When she was a child, she thought that everybody has two navels but when she discovered her doll, Minnie, has only one, she threw it into the pond.  Then she told Pepe that her mother is also in Hong Kong. Pepe talked to Senora Concha Vidal and discovered from her that Connie was lying – that she is not 30 years old, only 18; that she was not married a morning just before she came to consult him, but a year ago; that she has only ONE navel. Senora de Vidal also told Pepe that she forced Connie to marry Macho Escobar because Connie was upset about the rumor that her father, Manolo Vidal, spends the public fund to send his children to school. Because Connie was just forced to marry to a man she really does not love, Senora Concha told Pepe that Connie was chasing a bandleader named Paco Texeira, that’s why she is now in Hong Kong. She and Macho followed Connie in Hong Kong they can bring her back to the Philippines. Macho’s reason in taking her back is to avoid humiliation for her politician father by creating a scandal because it is election times in the Philippines. Pepe told Senora de Vidal that Paco is married to Mary and that he and Paco are gradeschool friends. After talking to Senora de Vidal, Pepe went to the Texeira’s.

Cultural Approach on F. Sionil Jose’s “Waywaya”

Waywaya is a short story written by the Filipino writer, F. Sionil Jose. It is originally written in Ilokano, Jose’s native language, and recreates the pre-Hispanic Philippine society (Goodreads, 2013). It is one of the many works of Sionil Jose that was translated into foreign languages, especially English, making Jose the most popular Filipino writer abroad among other Filipino authors -- of course, next to the greatest Filipino writer and patriot, Jose P. Rizal who was martyred in the struggle against Spanish domination (Yabes, 2013). Waywaya, according to F. Sionil Jose, himself, is based on a true story. He explained the story in his regular column, HINDSIGHT, in The Philippine Star (2012):

“Waywaya” is based on a true Papua New Guinea story. Georgina, the wife of the German ethnographer Ulli Beier who headed the Institute of PNG Culture in the early sixties related it. A man kidnapped a woman from an enemy tribe to be his slave but he fell in love with her. When she died, custom demanded that she be returned to her tribe. He did because he truly loved her. As expected, he was killed and eaten by the woman’s relatives.

Waywaya is the Filipino version, specifically Ilokano, of that Papua New Guinea story, with the Ilokano beliefs and traditions and the cultural strain reflected in the short story of Jose. The title itself (Waywaya) is an Ilokano word meaning “freedom” (Jose, 2012).

Philosophical Approach on Hermann Hesse’s “Siddhartha"

Introduction

Siddhartha by Hermann Hesse is a Nobel Prize-winner and Hesse’s most famous and influential work. It is a novel that tells a story of a young man who lives a life in search for enlightenment. On his way in this spiritual quest, he neglects every kind of doctrine because of his distrust on the words that come from teachers. He believes that one can gain wisdom not through teachings but through his own experiences. The basic philosophy therefore that the author tries to portray in his work is that man can attain enlightenment or inner peace through personal learnings from experiences not through listening from the teachings of doctrines. This philosophy was embodied in the person of the novel’s hero, Siddhartha.

Summary

            Siddhartha is a young son of a Brahmin priest but is not contented from the ablutions, the sacrifices, the books, and the Brahmins’ discourses so he went on his own way of spiritual quest together with his friend, Govinda. His goal is to release his soul from suffering. They first went to the forest to become a Samana but Siddhartha realized that they cannot attain Nirvana (salvation of the soul from suffering) through listening only to the Samana teachers because the adviser himself, in his sixties, had still not attained Nirvana. Then they met Gotama Buddha, the Illustrious One, in his garden in Anarthapindika, and were attracted to the magnificence of the Enlightened One. They listen to one of his lectures and Govinda promised his allegiance to the Buddha. Siddhartha, however continued his pilgrimage for his own goal, leaving Govinda to Gotama. Still, Siddhartha considers Gotama as a man who have reached salvation, but he could not gain salvation through his teachings because Gotama himself did not learn from teachings.

A Reading of William Topaz McGonagall’s “The Demon Drink” In the Light of Plato’s “The Republic”

“The Demon Drink” by William Topaz McGonagall

Oh, thou demon Drink, thou fell destroyer;

Thou curse of society, and its greatest annoyer.

What hast thou done to society, let me think?

I answer thou hast caused the most of ills, thou demon Drink. 

Thou causeth the mother to neglect her child,

Also the father to act as he were wild,

So that he neglects his loving wife and family dear,

By spending his earnings foolishly on whisky, rum and beer. 

And after spending his earnings foolishly he beats his wife-

The man that promised to protect her during life-

And so the man would if there was no drink in society,

For seldom a man beats his wife in a state of sobriety. 

And if he does, perhaps he finds his wife fou',

Then that causes, no doubt, a great hullaballo;

When he finds his wife drunk he begins to frown,

And in a fury of passion he knocks her down. 

And in that knock down she fractures her head,

And perhaps the poor wife she is killed dead,

Whereas, if there was no strong drink to be got,

To be killed wouldn't have been the poor wife's lot. 

Then the unfortunate husband is arrested and cast into jail,

And sadly his fate he does bewail;

And he curses the hour that ever was born,

And paces his cell up and down very forlorn. 

And when the day of his trial draws near,

No doubt for the murdering of his wife he drops a tear,

And he exclaims, "Oh, thou demon Drink, through thee I must die,"

And on the scaffold he warns the people from drink to fly, 

Because whenever a father or a mother takes to drink,

Step by step on in crime they do sink,

Until their children loses all affection for them,

And in justice we cannot their children condemn. 

 The man that gets drunk is little else than a fool,

And is in the habit, no doubt, of advocating for Home Rule;

But the best Home Rule for him, as far as I can understand,

Is the abolition of strong drink from the land.

And the men that get drunk in general wants Home Rule;

But such men, I rather think, should keep their heads cool,

And try and learn more sense, I most earnestlty do pray,

And help to get strong drink abolished without delay. 

If drink was abolished how many peaceful homes would there be,

Just, for instance in the beautiful town of Dundee;

then this world would be heaven, whereas it's a hell,

An the people would have more peace in it to dwell 

Alas! strong drink makes men and women fanatics,

And helps to fill our prisons and lunatics;

And if there was no strong drink such cases wouldn't be,

Which would be a very glad sight for all christians to see. 

O admit, a man may be a very good man,

But in my opinion he cannot be a true Christian

As long as he partakes of strong drink,

The more that he may differently think. 

But no matter what he thinks, I say nay,

For by taking it he helps to lead his brither astray,

Whereas, if he didn't drink, he would help to reform society,

And we would soon do away with all inebriety. 

Then, for the sake of society and the Church of God,

Let each one try to abolish it at home and abroad;

Then poverty and crime would decrease and be at a stand,

And Christ's Kingdom would soon be established throughout the land. 

Therefore, brothers and sisters, pause and think,

And try to abolish the foul fiend, Drink.

Let such doctrine be taught in church and school,

That the abolition of strong drink is the only Home Rule.

            William Topaz McGonagall’s “The Demon Drink” (1890) is a poem that discusses the evils of the Demon Drink and teaches that the abolition of this drink would make increase peaceful homes. This demon drink destroys the society and it is proper that the abolition of this strong drink be taught in church and in school. A man and a woman may behave wildly when he or she is drunk and may promote troubles in the family if this foolishness continues. This theme makes the whole poem of William Topaz McGonagall.

In “The Republic” (360 B.C.), Plato presents Socrates setting the requirements of the stories that are to be read to the children in the State. It must teach a lesson and should not contain false accounts on gods and heroes that will corrupt the youth’s minds into believing that gods and heroes perform evil deeds. Some of the rules in “The Republic”, which are the bases for  discussion in this paper, state that evil acts are unholy, that God causes only good things, that lamentations are not for famous men, that temperance must be taught to the youth, and that Simple Narration is a better style than Imitation.

A READING OF SAMUEL TAYLOR COLERIDGE’S “WORK WITHOUT HOPE” IN THE LIGHT OF HORACE’S “ARS POETICA”

“Work Without Hope” is a 14-line poem written by Samuel Taylor Coleridge in 1825. It presents the author’s musing of nature’s busyness in contrast to his emotional self. It is a romantic poem which presents nature as a reflection of beauty and of human’s emotions as well.

Samuel Taylor Coleridge, according to Bio.com (2013),

…was born on October 21, 1772 in Devon, England. A friend to poet William Wordsworth, Coleridge was a founder of the English Romantic Movement. His best known poems are "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner" and "Kubla Khan," the latter of which was reportedly written under the influence of opium. Coleridge died in 1834.

To help read and analyse the poem “Work Without Hope” by Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Horace, a Roman Poet, expressed some guidelines of writing Poetry in his work, “Ars Poetica” or “The Art of Poetry”. “Ars Poetica” deals with the art of poetry under three heads: the subject matter, the form, and the poet.

This paper will point out the rules stated by Horace in “Ars Poetica”, which include the Subject-Matter, Diction, Purpose, Form and Content Match, and Feelings, to help read and analyse Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s “Work Without Hope”.

A READING OF EURIPIDES’ “HELEN” IN THE LIGHT OF ARISOTLE’S “POETICS”

A READING OF EURIPIDES’ “HELEN”  

IN THE LIGHT OF ARISOTLE’S “POETICS”

by Harlem Jude P. Ferolino

            “Helen” is an ancient tragedy written by Euripides in 412 BCE. In this play, Euripides created his own version of the story of Helen, showing that she was never unfaithful to Menelaus, her husband. She never abandoned Menelaus and went to Troy with Paris unlike what the common myth says– it was her fake double who did – because she was just supernaturally transported to Egypt by Hermes, on Hera’s command, where she was patiently waiting for her husband to find her. When the shipwrecked Menelaus appeared in Egypt, things got complicated.

According to N.S. Gill,

“Euripides wrote about women and mythological themes like Medea and Helen of Troy. He enhanced the importance of intrigue in tragedy. Some aspects of Euripides' tragedy seem more at home in comedy than in tragedy, and, indeed, Euripides is considered to have been a significant influence on the Greek creation of New Comedy, a development in comedy that comes later than Euripides and his contemporary, the most familiar writer of Old Comedy, Aristophanes.” (2013)

 In this paper, we will determine the quality of Euripides’ “Helen” as a tragedy considering the principles in Aristotle’s “Poetics”, focusing on the two important parts, namely the Plot and Character. The paper will also discuss Thought, Diction, Song, and Spectacle as other parts of Tragedy.

Societal Norms, Mythology and Romance in Indian Literature

Chapter Critique 4 – INDIAN LITERATURE

By Harlem Jude P. Ferolino

The Societal Norms, Mythology, and Romance in Mahamaya, Selected Stories from Panchatantra and Selected poems from Gitanjali:

I.                    Mahamaya

A.   Societal Norms

Mahamaya presents the societal norms of marriage in India. Arranged marriages are preponderant. These are caused by the parents’ decision for their children. Because of the marriage customs in India, the parents could only arrange marriages with families of the same social status as theirs. Indian culture has this social stratification called the Caste System that distinguishes the higher and lower classes. This comprises the groups, Brahmins, Kshatriya, Vaisyas, Shudras, and Dalit or Untouchables. A woman in a Brahman caste, for example, could not be married to a man in the Kshatriya or to any other caste outside their own, and vice versa. Marrying from a different caste is frowned upon especially in the higher caste. This norm somehow differentiates the concept of Love and Marriage. In Mahamaya by Tagore, Mahamaya, a woman from the Brahman caste, has a romantic connection with Rajeev, a man from the lower caste. Unfortunately, there is a difficulty in finding Mahamaya a groom from the same caste as hers for no particular reason. When Rajeev proposed for a wedding to Mahamaya, she could only refuse to him because of the difference in their social status. Later came her brother, Bhavanicharan, and Mahamaya just followed him without a word. He handed down a red wedding sari to Mahamaya. She put it on as instructed by her brother because later on, we learn that her brother arranged her to an old Brahmin biding for death, to prevent the future humiliation to their family in case Mahamaya and Rajeev will decide for an inter-caste marriage. Mahamaya and the old man got married that night, but the next day Mahamaya became a widow. This shows how marriages are arranged in India in the time of Tagore. To date, reports claim that inter-caste marriages are now rising up in urban India, “because of female literacy and education, women at work, urbanization, need for two-income families, and influences from the media” (Wikipedia).

Sufism in Hafiz's Poem, "I've Said it Before, and I'll Say It Again"

Chapter Critique 3: Persian and Arabian Literature

By Harlem Jude P. Ferolino

I'VE SAID IT BEFORE, AND I'LL SAY IT AGAIN

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again,

It’s not my fault that with a broken heart, I’ve gone this way.

In front of a mirror they have put me like a parrot,

And behind the mirror the Teacher tells me what to say.

Whether I am perceived as a thorn or a rose, it’s

The Gardener who has fed and nourished me day to day.

O friends, don’t blame me for this broken heart;

Inside me there is a great jewel and it’s to the Jeweler’s shop I go.

Even though, to pious, drinking wine is a sin,

Don’t judge me; I use it as a bleach to wash the color of hypocrisy away.

All that laughing and weeping of lovers must be coming from some other place;

Here, all night I sing with my winecup and then moan for You all day.

If someone were to ask Hafiz, “Why do you spend all your time sitting in

The Winehouse door?,” to this man I would say, “From there, standing,

I can see both the Path and the Way.

-  Hafiz

    

-- image from english.samaylive.com --

“I’ve Said It Before and I’ll Say It Again” is a poem written by Hafiz, an ardent follower of Sufi Mysticism. Sufism is defined as the endeavour to produce a personal experience of the divine through mystic and ascetic discipline.

The poem is about a Sufi drinking wine as a symbol of purification. Purification or “the cleansing of the soul” is one aspect of Sufi Mysticism. Discussed in this poem is the philosophy that our soul belongs to the supreme Spirit, the source of all, and will return from it when the soul’s purpose is done. Through the mystic and ascetic discipline of Sufism, the soul realizes its purpose and his path of spirituality.

My First Conscious Out of Body Experience (01-22-13)

             The sensation of actually leaving your body is an amazing experience. You can experience your true being. You can feel the soul that has been contained in your physical body for a long time. You can reach out limitless possibilities with your spiritual double while you are out from that physical container. Today, a conscious Out of Body Experience is experienced by many, but that’s just a few of the world’s total population. You can be one of those few people. Only if you know how this phenomenon works.

But what really is an Out of Body Experience or OBE?

                                  

Summary of 'Of Mice and Men'

“Of Mice and Men” by John Steinbeck is about two poor homeless migrant workers, who dream for a place where they can work for their own land, grow their own crops, raise animals, and live a free life without anyone to take their fruits of labour away from them. However, as the novel ends, their dreams and plans leads to nothing leaving one of the main characters alone in hopelessness and despair. Two friends, George Milton, who is intellectually strong, and Lennie Small, who is mentally weak, are on their way for a job at a nearby ranch. They stopped at the Salinas River to take a break. Lennie forgets where they are going so George, annoyed by him, reminds him about their jobs. As Lennie looks for his work card, he finds a dead mouse in his pocket. Lennie likes to pet animals which are soft like mice but because of his uncontrollable strength, he often kills them. George demands him to throw the dead animal but Lennie manages to hide the mouse. George soon finds that Lennie still keeps the mouse and he gets angry with him. He later comforts Lennie by telling about a dream when one day they will have their own farmhouse where they will grow their own crops and Lennie will tend his rabbits. The two workers arrived at the ranch in Soledad the next morning but annoy the owner for being late. Curley, the owner’s son, is a small man who hates big guys like Lennie. Curley’s wife enters after Curley left the room. George warns Lennie to stay away with Curley and his wife after seeing her seductive stance. Later, Slim and Carlson, who are also ranch workers, came into the bunkhouse. Lennie finds that Slim has a dog which just had puppies so he then anxiously wanted to have something soft to pet. Carlson, on the other hand, suggests Candy, an old handyman and a co-worker, to kill his smelly ancient sheepdog and take one of Slim’s puppies. Lennie finally gets his pup and spends the night petting it. George tells Slim about their last job in Weed. The reason why they are searching for a new job is because Lennie had unintentionally stroked a woman who later seeks help to the police making Lennie and him to leave the town. Candy, later on, had his dog, which he has kept for many years, shot and killed by Carlson. When George and Lennie were talking about their dream again, Candy hears them and asks if he could come with them, suggesting that they can have his saving for the dream farm. George agrees and Lennie smiles. Curley, who has just arrived, offended by Lennie’s smile because he thought he is laughing at him, fights with him, and Lennie, who does not want to fight, attacks Curley resulting to Lennie breaking Curley’s hand. Lennie, being mildly retarded, does not know what was happening but he has badly hit Curley. All the men went to the town leaving Crooks (the black worker) behind along with Candy, Lennie, and Curley’s wife. Crooks told Lennie about his loneliness. Candy mentioned George’s and Lennie’s dream but Crooks does not see the possibility of it to come true but changes his mind after listening to Candy and wants to come with them. The men became uncomfortable by the arrival of Curley’s wife. She criticizes their dream making Crooks angry. She then warns him that he is just a worker – a black worker! Crooks just remained silent. When she hears the men who are returning from the town, Curley’s wife leaves. Crooks tells Candy that he is not interested in coming with them anymore. Lennie pets his puppy alone in the barn the next afternoon and accidentally kills it. He hides it before Curley’s wife arrived, who tells him her dream of being a movie star. She later finds out that Lennie likes soft things, so she offers her soft hair so that Lennie can touch it. Lennie, uncontrollably strokes too hard making the lady scream violently. He tries to quiet her but accidentally breaks her neck and kills her. Lennie runs away before Candy and George find her body. The other men, including Curley, also found the dead body and carrying their guns with them, hunt for Lennie to kill him. Lennie hides from Curley and the other men. George finds him. George assures Lennie that he is not mad at him and tells him again about their farm and rabbits that he will tend. When the men are getting near them, George shoots Lennie at the head. Curley and Carlson congratulated George for what he has done while Slim understands that George did not really want to kill his companion but because George should, he did. George and Slim went away, drinking.